• Show this post
    Hi folks!

    I Think it would be fine to add series entries like "Ultradisc", "Ultradisc II" and "Ultradisc UHR" to all MFSL (SA)CD-Releases.

    For collectors these series entries would be be very helpful.

    My suggested series entries to use are e.g.:
    http://www.discogs.sitioby.com/label/902147-UltradiscTM
    http://www.discogs.sitioby.com/label/901965-Ultradisc-II
    http://www.discogs.sitioby.com/label/436112-Ultradisc-UHRTM-GAIN-2TM-Series

    Any other suggestions for other/additional entries?

  • Show this post
    VarUniiX According their website there are several series:

    Ultradisc UHR™ SACD
    And this is divided into subcategories:

    Ultradisc UHR™ Stereo Hybrid
    Ultradisc UHR™ Mono Hybrid
    Ultradisc UHR™ Multichannel Hybrid

    Forgot to mention the last one...
    Ultradisc II Gold CD

  • Show this post
    Those are not series.

    Ultradisc is MOFI's marketing term for its gold CDs. The original Ultradisc were pressed in Japan; Ultradisc II were pressed in the US.

  • Show this post
    NeoSoulGroove
    According their website there are several series:

    Show me where they call it a series …
    They are listed as used technologies: http://www.mofi.com/Articles.asp?ID=254

    DetroitBootyBass
    Those are not series.

    +1

    Ultradisc UHR™ GAIN 2™ Series – Where's the word series in the logo?
    A logo for a mastering technology doesn't make a series.
    Would be candidates for the new Trademark thingie … but no series.
    For me the same as 20bit K2 Super Coding Digital K2 etc.

    See http://www.discogs.sitioby.com/forum/thread/697566
    That would be a way …

  • Show this post
    Right. They're no "series" at all. I simply thought ing the series tag to ensure a better overview of these different "series".

  • Show this post
    I have cleared the profiles and invalidated all three Non-Series now as per creator of series, website and series definition of Discogs. Feel free to create a list or in discussion Branding: http://www.discogs.sitioby.com/forum/thread/697566

  • Show this post
    typoman2
    I have cleared the profiles and invalidated all three Non-Series

    They are a series. The Mofi website advises and advised it. it has noteable branding. Even if the word series is absent, the consistent branding is enough.

    typoman2
    Where's the word series in the logo?

    I would have named it "Ultradisc II" myself but the name used above was the full name given on Mofi.com at the time (on the individual sales pages for each CD they d) - similar to this:
    http://screencast.com/t/aNrb5WcNHzk

    DetroitBootyBass
    Those are not series.

    If this is entered purely as a description of a technique used, why use VERY consistent branding and why market based on that consistency. The reason is that it;s a series as they used to advise on their website up til around 2011 on their item sales page (for each CD) when they changed the configuration of their website.

  • Show this post
    Well, Eviltoastman … the thread has been up for 3 months.
    After the creator of the so called series himself has itted they are no series (and I still say it's a technology branding as 20bit K2 Super Coding etc.) I have waited for another 5 days for opinions before invalidating.
    Can't do more than follow the protocol.

  • Show this post
    I cleaned up all releases in the invalidated series. I hope this mass edit according to this thread was ok.

  • Show this post
    VarUniiX
    I hope this mass edit according to this thread was ok.

    Thank you and yes, it was.

  • Show this post
    I think you did the right thing. I never really paid much attention to it before but I see nothing that points to your having been mistaken in doing so. Actually, I'm glad you cleared it up for us.

  • Eviltoastman edited over 9 years ago
    typoman2
    Can't do more than follow the protocol.

    We can agree a correct series name or agree that it was already correct and edit the releases which have had valid information removed from them as we should correct instead of removing incorrect data (it is not yet proven that it is incorrect as this is precisely how Mofi marketed the series between 2008 and 2010 - but I would prefer Ultradisc and Ultradisc II).

    typoman2
    After the creator of the so called series himself has itted they are no series (and I still say it's a technology branding as 20bit K2 Super Coding etc.)

    I'm not going to comment on that thread right now.

    Series - A branded series of releases. These will usually be a number of releases on one label, carrying a distinct extra branding indicating a series. The most common and sure way of knowing if something is a series is when the word 'series' appears in the name, for example, "The Silver Spotlight Series". The word can also appear on the back of the release, or externally on official websites or publications.

    Sometimes, it is not apparent whether the branding is meant to be a series or a label, for example "Talkin' Loud Classics". Treat it as a label until there is proof it should be a series.

    Compilations that are sequentially numbered can be added as a series. They are usually on one label, contain tracks by different artists, only have one version of each release, possibly two or three, and have a common theme running through their titles / artwork / tracks. Larger 'volume compilations' may have a redesign during their lifespan, but the theme will remain - usually in the title.

    Releases that are not a series include numbered or otherwise ordered original works by an artist, for example, Led Zeppelin l / II / III / IV, Beethoven's Symphony No.1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 etc, Selected Ambient Works 85-92 and Selected Ambient Works Volume II. If the releases are connected in some manner, but have no branding on the releases, then are not considered a series - for example, Drexciya "Storms". Branding for an album and related set of singles, promos etc when the concept falls short of being a proper series, and isn't called one by the label, should not be treated as a series - for example, "Motown Remixed".

    Other words can be used to indicate a series, for example, "collection".

    If the releases in the series have a number associated with them, this can be entered into the 'catalog number' field adjacent to the series name. Enter the numbering as it appears on the release, for example, "Vol. One", "Part 6". When possible, don't repeat the series name in the series number, for example, "The Greatest Hits '92 - Vol. 4" would be entered as "'92 - Vol. 4" .


    The alternative to listing it as a series would be to list it as a label.

    This is the guideline. As you can see the term "series" does not have to appear on the release but it must be understood to be a series and website verification is fine. nik advised here:
    nik
    20 Bit Remastered seems ok as a series - it is branded and called a series. Generic series names should not preclude them being series on Discogs.

    http://www.discogs.sitioby.com/forum/thread/326128#3077802

    Whether the guideline and nik's advice in that quote were followed in your linked example is something I will explore. I am currently not certain that proper checks were made prior to the conclusion. If it was not and is externally referred to as a series by a good source I will certainly consider re-opening the issue. Certainly the issue we are discussing is more akin the the topic Nik commented on for 20 bit Remastering since we have concrete examples of the term Series being applied by the responsible label.

    typoman2
    After the creator of the so called series himself has itted they are no series

    Actually, he mass edited the original series he had no part in creating without a discussion then said Ultradisc 2 wasn;t a series after some assumptions based on incommensurable forum discussions ;)

  • Show this post
    VarUniiX
    I simply thought ing the series tag to ensure a better overview of these different "series".


    I didn't thought about the guidelines and I didn't thought about (existing) discussions. I simply started mass-editing for the quoted reason.

    And now after knowing that the use of the series-tag was improper I cleaned up all the releases in the invalidated series.

    Sorry for that!

  • progcode edited over 9 years ago
    They are a series. They have clear branding and are used to delineate which type of technology was used to create the particular Mofi disc. This is ENTIRELY relevant due to the types of releases Mofi makes. I wish I had been paying closer attention here. I have not been able to devote my time to Discogs for several months now. These series have been handled entirely wrongly, and now good data has been removed from the database. This needs to be fixed.

    In spite of the post above mine that might be saying that it has been fixed, it has not.

  • noirday edited over 9 years ago
    comment removed by spatafore

  • Show this post
    VarUniiX
    I cleaned up all releases in the invalidated series. I hope this mass edit according to this thread was ok.


    that means that we can create two entries, one for ultradisc japan and other for ultradisc II usa? I hope so because are DIFFERENT! and collectors like me like see individual things, is slow ask to sellers "hey your copy is ultradisc o ultradisc II????" actually both have different dates.

    so I can create individual entries?

  • Show this post
    noirday
    so I can create individual entries?

    Open a separate thread, present your proof they are indeed series and separate series and let the community decide.

  • Show this post
    typoman2
    spataforeso I can create individual entries?
    Open a separate thread, present your proof they are indeed series and separate series and let the community decide.


    thanks, well maybe yes, but why not here, is the same question or well very related.

  • 35DP edited over 9 years ago
    If you're asking whether there can be two separate submissions - one for an original Ultradisc I issue of an MFSL disc, and one for a later Ultradisc II repress - most definitely. See Disraeli Gears, for example. Being pressed in different plants (and continents) immediately makes them both eligible. But "Ulltradisc I" and "Ultradisc II" should not be listed as a Series for these releases - it should go in the Release Note. - see new ruling below

  • Show this post
    noirday
    but why not here, is the same question or well very related

    Because we do it this way … seperate subject, sparate thread.

  • progcode edited over 9 years ago
    I am amazed that there is no response to my post in this thread from 2 months ago. Please, explain concisely right here how the very clear branding of Ultradisc, Ultradisc II and Ultradisc UHR on these releases does not qualify as being separate Series for Mobile Fidelity? It's not just text. It is a branding. This mass edit was wrong.

    MasterSound (4)? Should I keep going? Is anyone in fact going to reply this time?

  • Show this post
    Is the problem that this is simply a semantic debate? I don't think there is *one* definition for the term "series".

  • Show this post
    Not sure if this helps, but:

    > Mobile Fidelity is proud to release Primus’s Animals Should Not Try To Act Like People EP on its *GAIN 2 Ultra Analog series*

    - https://web.archive.org/web/20040611023206/http://www.mofi.com/

    > While the interview focused mostly on the release of his ground-breaking album "Drive" on *Ultradisc UHR™ Discovery Series*

    - https://web.archive.org/web/20050401233820/http://www.mofi.com/

    I wouldn't call that conclusive, but it appears MoFi did use the term "series" on a few occasions.

  • noirday edited over 9 years ago
    35DP

    If you're asking whether there can be two separate submissions - one for an original Ultradisc I issue of an MFSL disc, and one for a later Ultradisc II repress - most definitely. See Disraeli Gears and Disraeli Gears, for example. Being pressed in different plants (and continents) immediately makes them both eligible. But "Ulltradisc I" and "Ultradisc II" should not be listed as a Series for these releases - it should go in the Release Note.


    yeap! thanks I agree, separate items, even both share same masterings etc... they are different, so I continue adding separate.

    about the series, I don't know but just ! each "thing": ultradisc, ultradisc II, ultradisc UHR is an attempt from MOFI to make better the sound quality.

  • Staff 457

    Show this post
    It seems to be used constantly enough to be considered a series by our guidelines.

  • Show this post
    Quotes from the actual MOFI website:

    "The company returns to vinyl production with the introduction of the ANADISQ™ 200 LP series..."
    "The highly successful Ultradisc UHR™ SACD series..."
    "The legendary Ultradisc II 24 KT. Gold CD line"

  • progcode edited over 9 years ago
    Thank you Diognes.To the s who removed all of these Series: please undo all of your edits, as soon as you are able.

  • Show this post
    Firstly I started a mass edit to apply the series. Then I removed all the series according to this thread.

    Should I now re-apply all series?

  • Show this post
    Yes, none of these series should have been removed from the database.

  • Show this post
    Somewhere above in this thread the opposite was said after I applied the series in many entries. :-/

    But ok...I'll start doin' that later.

  • Show this post
    Diognes_The_Fox

    Which series should I apply and how should they called exactly?

    My suggestions:

    Ultradisc™
    Ultradisc II™
    Ultradisc UHR™

  • Show this post
    I'd leave out the "TM", that's not part of the name.

  • Show this post
    I also think the TM should be left out.

  • Show this post
    Alright.

    Actual suggestions for series entries and spelling are:

    Ultradisc
    Ultradisc II
    Ultradisc UHR

    Any further suggestions for series entries?

  • Show this post
    VarUniiX
    Ultradisc
    Ultradisc II
    Ultradisc UHR

    +1

  • Staff 457

    Show this post
    progcode
    +1


    That works for me.

  • Show this post
    Diognes_The_Fox

    Than I'll start mass editing soon referring to this thread.

    Do I have your (as a member of the Discogs staff) "official" permission to do so?

  • Show this post
    VarUniiX
    Alright.

    Actual suggestions for series entries and spelling are:

    Ultradisc
    Ultradisc II
    Ultradisc UHR

    Any further suggestions for series entries?


    also the:

    UHQR https://www.discogs.sitioby.com/label/308791-UHQR-Vinyl-Series
    and
    ANADISQ™ 200 (1994-1996) https://img.discogs.sitioby.com/Xpd9oZqWqDeEwJCmediiXVNGfeM=/fit-in/600x600/filters:strip_icc():format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-2710232-1450106351-6232.jpeg.jpg

    both for vinyl

  • Show this post
    noirday
    UHQR https://www.discogs.sitioby.com/label/308791-UHQR-Vinyl-Series
    and
    ANADISQ™ 200 (1994-1996) https://img.discogs.sitioby.com/Xpd9oZqWqDeEwJCmediiXVNGfeM=/fit-in/600x600/filters:strip_icc():format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-2710232-1450106351-6232.jpeg.jpg

    UHQR Vinyl Series looks to me like it should just be "UHQR". And "Anadisq 200" looks like it would probably merit being a series. Do you have a list of ones that show that branding?

  • Show this post
    I just noticed that there is already a company entry for Ultradisc that is unrelated to MFSL. Perhaps this is why someone previously had added this one with the TM. This is going to make a likely confusing "Ultradisc (2)' for Ultradisc, and "Ultradisc II' for the second series. Yuck.

  • Show this post
    progcode

    Woul it be possible to rename this existing non-MFSL-related Ultradisc entry to "Ultradisc (2)"? If so the name entry "Ultradisc" could be used for the MFSL-related entries.

  • Show this post
    progcode
    spataforeUHQR https://www.discogs.sitioby.com/label/308791-UHQR-Vinyl-Series
    and
    ANADISQ™ 200 (1994-1996) https://img.discogs.sitioby.com/Xpd9oZqWqDeEwJCmediiXVNGfeM=/fit-in/600x600/filters:strip_icc():format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-2710232-1450106351-6232.jpeg.jpg
    UHQR Vinyl Series looks to me like it should just be "UHQR". And "Anadisq 200" looks like it would probably merit being a series. Do you have a list of ones that show that branding?


    Original Master Recording UHQR Vinyl
    =============================
    catalog number artist title
    005 Supertramp Crime Of The Century
    017 Pink Floyd The Dark Side Of The Moon
    025 Earl Klugh Finger Paintings
    035 Cat Stevens Tea For The Tillerman
    084 The Alan Parson's Project I Robot
    100 The Beatles Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
    507 Maazel & The Cleveland Symphany Feste Romane
    510 Sir George Solti & The London Philharmonic Holst: The Planets

    Original Master Recording Anadisq Vinyl
    ==============================
    catalog number date released artist title
    199 Jan-94 Manhattan Transfer Extensions
    201 Jan-94 Muddy Waters Folk Singer
    202 Feb-94 Pink Floyd Atom Heart Mother
    203 Jan-94 Emerson, Lake & Palmer Tarkus
    204 Apr-94 Alan Parsons Tales of Mystery
    205 Dec-94 Modern Jazz Quartet Modern Jazz Quartet
    206 Sep-94 Modern Jazz Quartet Blues At Carnige Hall
    207 Jun-95 U2 Unforgettable Fire
    208 Sep-94 Stan Getz & Joao Gilberto Getz/Gilberto
    209 Sep-94 Traffic Low Spark of High Heeled Boys
    210 Nov-94 John Hiatt Bring the Family
    211 Jan-95 Queen The Game
    212 Nov-94 Jean Michel Jarre Oxygene
    213 Feb-95 The Allman Brothers Brothers & Sisters
    214 Jan-95 Duke Ellington Anatomy Of A Murder
    215 Jan-95 Moody Blues Threshold Of A Dream
    216 Dec-94 Dave Brubeck We're All Together For The First Time
    217 Feb-95 Cray, Collins & Copeland Showdown
    218 Mar-95 Emerson, Lake & Palmer Trilogy
    219 Mar-95 Woody Herman The Fourth Heard
    220 Mar-95 Eric Clapton Eric Clapton
    221 Apr-95 Bob Marley Exodus
    222 Apr-95 John Mellencamp Lonesome Jubilee
    223 Apr-95 Joe Cocker Shefield Steel
    224 May-95 Hank Crawford Soul of the Ballad
    2-225 May-95 Todd Rundgren Something, Anything
    226 May-95 Albert Collins Cold Snap
    227 Jun-95 Jean Michel Jarre Equinoxe
    228 Jun-95 Modern Jazz Quartet At The Music Inn
    2-229 Jul-95 Elliot Lawrence Music of Elliot Lawrence
    230 Jul-95 Rick Wakeman Journey To The Center of the Earth
    231 Aug-95 R.E.M. Murmur
    232 Aug-95 Moody Blues Every Good Boy Deserves Favor
    233 Aug-95 Sonny Terry & Brownie Mcgee Sonny & Brownie
    234 Jul-95 Gerry Mulligan & Ben Webster Mulligan & Webster
    235 Sep-95 B.B. King Lucille
    236 Nov-95 Bob Marley Catch A Fire
    237 Sep-95 Count Basie April In Paris
    238 Sep-95 Joan Baez Diamonds & Rust
    2-239 Feb-96 Derek & The Dominos In Concert
    240 Oct-95 Bernard Herrmann Fantasy Film World of Bernard Herrmann
    241 Oct-95 Gerry Mulligan & Paul Desmond Mulligan & Desmond
    2-242 Dec-95 Sy Oliver Oliver's Twist
    243 Nov-95 Oscar Peterson & Milt Jackson Very Tall
    244 Oct-95 Cat Stevens Teaser and the Fire Cat
    245 Nov-95 Average White Band Average White Band
    246 Dec-95 John Mayall The Blues Alone
    247 Dec-95 Billie Holiday Body and Soul
    2-248 Jan-96 Ella Fitzgerald & Louis Armstrong Ella & Louie Again
    249 Mar-96 Boston Boston
    250 Feb-96 Toto IV
    251 Jul-96 Blood, Sweat & Tears Blood, Sweat & Tears
    252 Jan-96 Neil Young Old Ways
    253 Mar-96 Moody Blues To Our Children's Children's Children
    254 Jul-96 Cat Stevens IZITSO
    255 May-96 Bernard Herrmann Four Faces of Jazz
    256 May-96 Queen A Day At The Races
    257 Apr-96 Sonic Youth Goo
    258 Apr-96 Nirvana Nevermind
    260 Jun-96 Bing Crosby & Buddy Bregman Bing Crosby & Buddy Bregman
    261 Aug-96 R.E.M Reckoning
    2-262 Sep-96 Peter Frampton Frampton Comes Alive
    263 Aug-96 Bee Gees Trafalgar
    264 N/A Cream Goodybe
    265 Jun-96 Alexis Korner R&B From The Marquee
    267 N/A Robin Trower (Not Released)
    268 N/A Thelonious Monk Vol.1 (Not Released)
    269 N/A Thelonious Monk Vol. 2 (Not Released)

  • Show this post
    noirday

    Very cool! Thanks for the list.

  • Show this post
    So... First step of the series-update is done. I applied the "Ultradisc UHR" series tag in all SACD releases. Hope everything's ok now.

    https://www.discogs.sitioby.com/label/1009719-Ultradisc-UHR

    During this I found two possible duplicates (Patricia Barber - Companion and Frank Sinatra - No One Cares) where I started a merge vote.

    Data quality and merge votes are welcome. Thanks!

  • Show this post
    VarUniiX
    Woul it be possible to rename this existing non-MFSL-related Ultradisc entry to "Ultradisc (2)"? If so the name entry "Ultradisc" could be used for the MFSL-related entries.

    Unfortunately, we are not allowed to do that.

  • Show this post
    progcode
    Unfortunately, we are not allowed to do that.


    That's too bad. :-(

  • Show this post
    VarUniiX
    spatafore

    Very cool! Thanks for the list.


    no problem, by the way theres a "Aluminium" CDs by MFSL, that was released before the "Gold" CDs, but that ones don't have any series, just are know it like "Aluminium" MFSL CDs, the cat# starts with "MFCD".

    the name "Aluminium" is just to refer that is made like a normal silver cd... not gold cd like the Ultradisc's.
    http://www.keithhirsch.com/wordpress/wp-content/s/mfsl-cocker-mad-dogs_500.jpg

    one example here on discogs: https://www.discogs.sitioby.com/sell/release/4871983?ev=rb

    here's the list:

    catalog number artist title
    2-747 The Firesign Theatre Back From The Shadows
    748 The Firesign Theatre Fighting Clowns
    749 Eddie Hinton Letters From Mississippi
    750 Webb Pierce Sweet Memories & Sands Of Gold
    751 The Dixie Hummingbirds Every Day And Every Hour & We Love You Like A Rock
    752 Chris Spedding Café Days
    753 Toots & The Maytals And Others Live At Sunsplash, Reggae Festival
    754 The Nighhawks Open All Nite
    755 Phil Woods Quartet More Live
    756 The Pilgrim Jubilee Singers Walk On & The Old Ship Of Zion
    757 The Amos Garrett, Doug Sahm, Gene Taylor Band Live In Japan
    758 The Firesign Theatre Dear Friends
    759 Levon Helm Levon Helm
    2-760 The Swan Silverstones, Rev June Cheeks & The Sunset Travelers Raisin' The Roof
    761 Levon Helm Levon Helm And The Rco All-Stars
    762 The Firesign Theatre Waiting For The Electrician Or Someone Like Him
    763 The Gospelaires Can I Get A Witness & Bones In The Valley
    764 Taj Mahal Recycling The Blues & Other Related Stuff
    765 Taj Mahal Happy Just To Be Like I Am
    766 Little Milton Age Ain't Nothin But A Number
    767 Sensational Nightingales Heart And Soul & You Know Not The Hour
    768 Amos Garrett I Make My Home In My Shoes
    769 Five Blind Boys Of Mississippi My Desire & Somewhere There's A God
    770 Bobby Bland Touch Of The Blues & Spotlighting The Man
    771 The Dixie Hummingbirds Live (Hard Gospel Quartet)
    772 The Flying Burrito Bros. The Flying Burrito Bros.
    773 Maxine Sullivan Singing The Music Of Burton Lane
    774 Joshua Breakstone 4/4=1
    775 Charles Musselwhite Memphis, Tennessee
    776 Quincy Jones Smackwater Jack
    777 Joe Walsh Barnstorm
    778 Zero Here Goes Nothin'
    779 Waylon Jennings The Taker-Tulsa & Honky Tonk Heroes
    780 Big Joe Turner Singing The Blues
    781 Arturo Delmoni Sonatas Of Franck & Faure
    782 Harry Belafonte Belafonte Returns To Carnegie Hall
    783 Charles Mingus Mingus Plays Piano
    784 Zero Nothin' Goes Here
    785 Firesign Theatre I Think We're All Bozos. . .
    786 Claus Ogermann & The London Symphony Orchestra Symphonic Dances
    2-787 Chet Atkins Pickin' My Way
    788 Procol Harum Live With The Edmonton Symphony Orchestra
    789 The James Gang Live In Concert
    790 Brideshead Revisited Soundtrack
    791 Billard & Clark The Great Expedition; Through The Morning Through The Night
    792 The Youngbloods Elephant Mountain
    793 Procol Harum Home
    794 Phil Ochs Gunfight At Carnegie Hall
    795 Bert Kaempfert The Best Of The Bert Kaempfert
    796 The Starlight Orchestra In A Christmas Mood
    797 Various Artists Soundtrack From Porky's Revenge
    798 Various Artists The Steeple On The Common
    799 Various Artists New England Christmastide II
    800 Spirit Twelve Dreams Of Doctor Sardonicus
    801 Sonny Rollins Way Out West
    802 Stanislaw Skrowaczewski & Minnesota Orchestra Ravel: Bolero, Rhapsodie Espagnole, Pavine
    803 Al Stewart Year Of The Cat
    804 The Alan Parsons Project I Robot
    805 Art Pepper & Eleven Modern Jazz Classics
    806 Andrew Powell & Philharmonic Orchestra Best Of The Alan Parsons Project
    2-807 Louis Armstrong/Duke Ellington The Great Reunion
    808 Leonard Slatkin & St. Louis Symphony Prokofiev: Alexander Nevsky, Op. 78
    809 Shelly Manne & Friends My Fair Lady
    810 David Foster The Best Of Me
    811 Thomas Schippers & Cincinnati Symphony Strauss Don Juan, Till Eulenspiegel
    812 Environmental Sonics The Power & The Majesty, Vol. Ii
    2-813 The Blues A Real Summit Meeting (Live)
    814 Susskind & St. Louis Symphony Dvorak: Piano Concerto In G Minor
    815 The Kazu Matsui Project (Featuring Robben Ford) Standing On The Outside
    4-816 Woodstock Includes Woodstock I And II
    817 Thomas Schippers & Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra Schubert: Symphony No. 9
    818 Michael McNabb Computer Music
    819 Skrowaczewski & The Minnesota Orchestra Bartok: Music For String, Percussion And Celesta
    820 Aretha Franklin Live At The Fillmore West
    821 Mystic Moods Orchestra Another Stormy Night
    822 The Tubes The Tubes
    823 Procol Harum A Salty Dog
    2-824 Joe Cocker Mad Dogs And Englishmen
    825 Johnny Mathis Heavenly
    826 Max Roach & Clifford Brown Daahound
    827 Modern Jazz Quartet Live At The Lighthouse
    828 Miles Davis Someday My Prince Will Come
    829 Loggins & Messina Sittin' In
    830 Grateful Dead From The Mars Hotel
    2-831 Roy Budd & London Symphony Orchestra The Final Frontier
    832 The Staple Singers Respect Yourself
    833 Jimmy Raney Two Jims And A Zoot
    834 Firesign Theatre How Can You Be In Two Places . . .
    835 Booker T & The Mg's McLemore Avenue
    836 Maxine Sullivan Songs From The Cotton Club
    837 Steve Cropper With A Little Help From My Friends
    838 Albert King Live Wire/Blues Power
    839 Harry Betts & Orchestra Jazz Soul Of Dr. Kildare
    840 Billie Holiday In Rehearsal
    841 Charlie Barnet Big Band 1967
    842 Zoot Sims Zoot At Ease
    843 Maynard Ferguson The Blues Roar
    2-844 Sarah Vaughan The Complete Live In Japan Set
    845 The Wind In The Rigging Seafaring Songs
    846 Procol Harum Broken Barricades
    847 Humble Pie Rock On
    848 Rick Wakeman Journey To The Centre Of The Earth
    849 Ike & Tina Turner River Deep, Mountain High
    850 Rosemary Clooney & Duke Ellington Blue Rose
    851 Elmer Bernstein Movie & TV Themes
    852 Fedoseyev & USSR TV & Radio Large Symphony Orchestra Glazunov: Symphony No. 2
    853 Shelley Manne Mannekind
    2-854 Various Artist: A Tribute To Steve Goodman
    855 Sarah Vaughan A Time In My Life
    856 John Prine Aimless Love
    857 Muggsy Spanier & His Dixieland Band The Gem Of The Ocean
    858 Fedoseyev & USSR TV And Radio Large Symphony Orchestra Rachmaninov: Symphonic Dances
    859 Nekrasov & USSR TV & Radio Symphony Orchestra The Evening Bells
    860 Fedoseyev & USSR TV & Radio Large Symphony Orchestra Borodin: Polovetsian March, In The Speppes Of Central Asia Mussorgsky: Night On Bald Mountain Ippolitov-Ivanov: Caucasion Sketches
    861 Igor Bril Quartet Live At The Village Gate
    2-862 Ermler & Bolshoi Theatre Orchestra Popular Symphonic Pieces By Soviet Composers
    863 Svetlanov & USSR Symphony Orchestra Mendelssohn: Italian Symphony No. 4, Rossini: William Tell Overture
    864 Ovchinnikov & USSR TV & Radio Large Symphony Orchestra Tchaikovsky: sca Da Rimini, Romeo & Juliet
    865 S. Sondetskys & Lithuanian Chamber Orchestra A.Rudin, Cello Haydn: Concerto For Cello With Orchestra
    866 Dimitriev/ USSR Ministry Of Culture Orchestra Rachmaninov: Rhapsody On A Theme By Paganini; Gershwin: Rhapsody In Blue
    867 Fedoseyev & USSR TV & Radio Large Symphony Symphony Orchestra Glazunov: Symphony No. 1 In E Major, Op. 5
    868 Roger Williams The Roger Williams Collection
    869 Lazarev & Soloists Ensemble Of The Bolshoi Theature Works By Denisov, Schnittke, Gubaidulina, Mansurian
    870 Tchaikovsky Incidental Music From Hamlet, The Barber Of Seville, The Snow Maiden
    871 Emil Gilels Schumann: Nachtstucke, Op. 23; Schubert: Moments Musicaux, Op.24
    872 Willie Dixon I Am The Blues
    873 Pete Seeger The Bitter And The Sweet
    874 Ray Charles, Lightning Hopkins, Etc. Riot In Blues
    875 Kovalev & The Shostakovich Quartet Glazunov: Quintet For Two Violins And Two Cellos In A Major, Op. 39; Quartet No. 7 For Two Violins, Viola, And Cello In C Minor
    876 USSR TV & Radio Large Chorus Choral Music By Soviet Composers
    877 Arturo Delmoni Songs My Mother Taught Me
    878 Svetlanov & USSR Symphony Orchestra Arensky; Symphonies Nos. 1 And 2
    879 Daryl Hall And John Oates Past Times Behind
    880 Firesign Theatre Don't Crush That Dwarf, Hand Me The Pliers
    881 Oleg Lundstrem & His Orchestra In Swing Time
    882 Svetlanov & USSR Symphony Orchestra Tchaikovsky: Symphony No. 5 In E Minor, Op. 64
    883 Various Artists New England Christmastide
    884 Herb Stewart One Brother
    885 Svetlanov & Bolshoi Theatre Orchestra Rachmaninov: Symphony No. 2 In E Minor, Op. 27
    886 Art Farmer Here's That Rainy Day
    887 Leonid Chizhik Mobius Strip
    888 Rozhdestvensky & Moscow Radio Symphony Prokofiev: Symphonies Nos. 1 And 3, Concerto For Violin And Orchestra
    889 Caterina Valente & The Count Basie Orchestra Caterina 88
    890 Various Soviet Artists Jazz From The USSR
    891 Lazarev & Soloists Ensemble Of The USSR Bolshoi Theatre Stravinsky: L'histoire Du Soldat, Septet, Pribaoutki, Ragtime
    892 Svetlanov, USSR Symphony Orchestra Tchaikovsky: Symphony No. 6, Selection From Undine
    894 Moscow Jazz Festival Vol. 1 Jazz '84
    895 Grigori Ginzburg The Works Of Rubenstein & Liszt
    896 Kakhidze & State Symphony Of Georgia Giya Kancheli: Symphony No. 5, Bright Sorrow
    897 Glazunov Concerto For Violin & Orchestra;Symphony No. 4, Stenke Razin
    898 Allegro Jazz Ensemble Sphinx
    899 David Oistrakh Khachaturian: Concerto For Violin, & Orchestra In D Minor Sibelius: Concerto For Violin
    900 Svetlanov & USSR Symphony Orchestra Rachmaninov: The Isle Of The Dead, The Bells
    2-901 Kakhidze & USSR TV & Radio Large Symphony Orchestra A. Kanchaturian: Gayane, A Ballet In Three Acts
    902 David Azarian Trio Stairway To Seventh Heaven
    903 USSR Symphony Orchestra Artiomov: The Way To Olympus
    904 No Release N/A
    905 Vladimir Malinin Prokofiev, Kobekin, Bobylev, Schnittke
    906 Pavlenko, Smirnov, Bobylev, Firsova, Artiomov The Works Of Mokern Composers Of Moscow
    907 Svetlanov & USSR State Academy Orchestra Tikhon Khrennikov: Symphony No. 2, Concerto No. 1 For Violin & Orchestra In D Major, Op. 14 Vadim Repin, Violin
    908 Soviet Jazz Ensemble Boomerang
    909 David Oistrakh/S. Richter Shostakovich: Sonata For Violin And Piano, Op. 134; Cesar Franck: Sonata For Violin & Piano In A Major
    910 Various Artists Alternatives
    911 Various Artists Armenia, The Tragedy, The Music
    912 Sergei Stadler Bach Partitas
    913 No Release N/A
    914 Gosteleradio Quartet Glinka: Quartet No. 2 Miaskovsky: Quartet No. 13; Tanaev: String Trio
    915 Alfred Schnittke Chamber Pieces
    916 Kadans Moscow Chamber Jazz Ensemble
    917 Edison Denisov Works For Small Ensemble
    918 Vyacheslav Artiomov Songs, Hymns & Dreams
    919 Emil Gilels Prokofiev: Sonata For Klavier, No. 8; Visions Fugitives Op.134
    920 V Postnikova & G Rozhdestvensky Brahms: Souvenir De La Russie, 16 Waltzes & Variations On A Theme By Schumann
    921 Gidon Kremer Ysaye: Six Sonatas For Solo Violin, Opus 27
    922 Grigory Sokolov Beethoven: Sonata, Opus 106 (Hammerklavier)

  • Show this post
    noirday
    by the way theres a "Aluminium" CDs by MFSL, that was released before the "Gold" CDs, but that ones don't have any series, just are know it like "Aluminium" MFSL CDs, the cat# starts with "MFCD".

    the name "Aluminium" is just to refer that is made like a normal silver cd... not gold cd like the Ultradisc's.


    Yeah...I know. But I have actually no idea to handle the "Aluminium-CDs".

    It would be simply and nice to also collect them in an "aluminium series" but that won't fit to the guidelines in any way. :-/

    In the history section of the MOFI website the following is written:
    "As a result of a time-intensive process which incorporates advanced mastering techniques and custom-designed equipment, the Original Master Recording™ compact disc...is introduced by Mobile Fidelity..."

    Maybe "Original Master Recording™ Compact Disc" could be the appropriate name for that "aluminium series".

  • noirday edited over 9 years ago
    VarUniiX
    spataforeby the way theres a "Aluminium" CDs by MFSL, that was released before the "Gold" CDs, but that ones don't have any series, just are know it like "Aluminium" MFSL CDs, the cat# starts with "MFCD".

    the name "Aluminium" is just to refer that is made like a normal silver cd... not gold cd like the Ultradisc's.

    Yeah...I know. But I have actually no idea to handle the "Aluminium-CDs".

    It would be simply and nice to also collect them in an "aluminium series" but that won't fit to the guidelines in any way. :-/

    In the history section of the MOFI website the following is written:
    "As a result of a time-intensive process which incorporates advanced mastering techniques and custom-designed equipment, the Original Master Recording™ compact disc...is introduced by Mobile Fidelity..."

    Maybe "Original Master Recording™ Compact Disc" could be the appropriate name for that "aluminium series".


    yes could be that name or just create a public list with that cds but yes a series called "Original Master Recording™ Compact Disc" sounds more cool.

  • Show this post
    I don't like these lists. They're somehow lame and can be overlooked very easily. These lists are better for sharing things like "My top 100 albums of all time".

    Using series instead of lists is IMHO the only appropriate way to classify all releases of important collector labels like MFSL.

  • Show this post
    I think the problem here is that people are getting these "series" from the MFSL website and not the actual release.

    Most are just recording techniques and production methods used by MFSL and a logo produced to promote them.

    The reason why I'm commenting here is because I've been looking through the old Japanese Denon releases.

    Denon has thousands of releases with "Denon PCM", "PCM Digital" or "PCM Digital Recording" logos on them. Which are recording processes and not considered as a series. Also people have mistaken them for record labels. So where is the consistency between something like those in the database, and the branding used by MOFI? Once the website changes or disappears, you have nothing to go on.

    Another one is the "GAIN 2" process, so now we have GAIN 2™ Ultra Analog 180g Mono Series. Three series based on a brand of mastering! It seem incredibly convoluted to me.

  • Show this post
    "Using series instead of lists is IMHO the only appropriate way to classify all releases of important collector labels like MFSL."

    That's still my basic opinion to this problem. :-)

    A well-kept series-tagged entry is a much better way to clearly identify items cause the series-tag is displayed at a well visible position.
    For Example: The MFSL-release "Dark Side Of The Moon" is released as Ultradisc AND Ultradisc II. Both under the same catalog number.
    According to the guidelines you can differentiate the releases using the release notes oder putting them into different lists. Both ways are very lame IMHO and in addition not very fail-safe.

    Using series-tagging instead cleans up this mess and everything's fine. :-)

  • Show this post
    The problem is "well-kept", I can't see that happening for very long. Today (I had a day to kill) I cleaned up releases containing "PCM Digital Recording" and "PCm Digital" both used as series and labels when they were neither. Next to go is "Denon Pcm Recording". MFSL is a branding/collectors nightmare when catag them.

    If more features were added to the lists, then it's possible to catalogue them nicely for more hardcore collectors.

  • Show this post
    gotthefeelin
    The problem is "well-kept"

    Absolutely true!
    But that's a general problem of most entries here at Discogs. ;-)

    But mass-editing all MFSL-entries (about 1000 over all) is not that big thing. One or two evenings of work for one member and the work is done. Or the work will be done by several : one will add the tags for Ultradisc, another one will add the tags for Ultradisc II and so on.

    gotthefeelin
    ...then it's possible to catalogue them nicely for more hardcore collectors.

    IMHO it's already hardcore that there exist 400+ entries of "Dark Side Of the Moon". ;-)

  • Show this post
    VarUniiX
    For Example: The MFSL-release "Dark Side Of The Moon" is released as Ultradisc AND Ultradisc II. Both under the same catalog number.


    Yes, I can see the problem here. At least someone has entered the processes in the notes, so it can be searched, but it's not ideal.

    I'd personally like to see "series" separated from "label". So when you do a main search they're not mixed together.
    "Series" is a great way for collectors to find other releases in a series at a glance and helps tidying up a record label's catalogue.

    Another problem also, is once a label is first created, the title is almost set in stone. You can't edit it without also editing every release using that label. Example: WARNER MUSIC BRASIL LTDA. which is all in CAPS, who is going to edit 845 releases?

    Anyway, I'm sure someone is looking into it more thoroughly for a better solution.

  • Show this post
    If these are series, then why not Blu-spec CD, SHM-CD, etc? Same principle.

  • Show this post
    jansenENjanssen
    If these are series, then why not Blu-spec CD, SHM-CD, etc? Same principle.


    I am glad you brought it up.. this needs a thread by itself. However, back to your question, these are not SERIES, they should be added under Formats category as they are changes (improvements) in Hardware manufacturing being [CD] here, and not a record mastering processes, as has been done by so many companies in the past and till today such as TELARC, which has quite a few series of its own.

    BluSpec CD - SHMCD bring about better sonics due to better laser readability, and improvements in Bit encoding and oversampling recordings. Audiophile market has the corners stone on these formats. For the full list:

    Hi-Res Audio
    HDCD - High Definition Compatible Digital
    SACD - Super Audio Compact Disc
    XRCD - Extended Resolution Compact Disc
    LPCD - Long Play Compact Disc
    HQCD - High Quality Compact Disc
    AQCD - Analog Quality Compact Disc
    AMCD - Analog Master Compact Disc
    S - Audiofile Digital Master Series
    SHM-CD - Super High Material CD
    24KCD - 24K Compact Disc (GOLD CD)
    Blu-Spec CD
    CD - Compact Disc
    CD - Crystal Disc
    DDC - 1: 1 Direct Digital Master Cut Ultra Gold Disc
    DXD CD - Digital eXtreme Definition
    AAD - Almost Analogue Digital
    LD - Laser Disc
    VCD - Video Compact Disc
    DVD - Digital Video Disc
    BD - Blu-ray Disc
    DSD - Direct Stream Digital
    DST - Direct Stream Transfer
    Project R2R - Reel to Reel (Yes its back with a vengeance)

    However the following is for example is a very well know audio encoding/mastering technique:

    K2HD - K2 High Definition

    Although keep in mind, JVC (IP owner) almost always combines its K2HD technology with Hardware superiority like XRCD or HQCD, Gold, etc.

    Like I said the above formats need to be added to FORMATS category, its long overdue.. make a new thread for that if need be.

    That's my 2 cents,

    Oh and I am all in favor of series above, companies like MoFi & Telarc have these series as there own copyrighted Trademarks TM. So there should be no confusion with others.

    Cheers

  • Show this post
    Why should "XRCD" be a format? While it has a special mastering process, the result is an ordinarily manufactured and encoded CD.

  • Show this post
    amrtn
    Why should "XRCD" be a format? While it has a special mastering process, the result is an ordinarily manufactured and encoded CD.


    At first glance it appears that XRCD is merely an Encoding and Mastering process only, however, A specially modified Laser Cutter known as the DVD K2 Laser is utilized to create a CD Glass Master via JVC Extended Pit Cutting Technology [All propriety stuff here] in order to have a more precise pit length before burning it on to the glass master. So actual physical changes to the Redbook CD.

    It's all JVC technology through and through:
    JVC ORIGINAL ANALOG MASTERING CONSOLE
    JVC ORIGINAL 24BIT K2 A/D CONVERTER
    JVC ORIGINAL DIGITAL K2
    JVC ORIGINAL K2 Rubidium Master Clock
    JVC ORIGINAL Encode K2+K2 Laser Cutting

    End result a unique product, deserving its own category.
    To read more about the technology visit VICTOR JVC , here is a diagram:
    http://i.imgur.com/otpgLpb.jpg

  • Show this post
    OneObuyan
    At first glance it appears that XRCD is merely an Encoding and Mastering process only, however, A specially modified Laser Cutter known as the DVD K2 Laser is utilized to create a CD Glass Master via JVC Extended Pit Cutting Technology [All propriety stuff here] in order to have a more precise pit length before burning it on to the glass master. So actual physical changes to the Redbook CD.
    The glass master might be differently manufactured than what is usual for CDs, but the release itself, which is not the glass master, is a medium that is within the redbook standard and is made of the same material as all aluminum CDs.

  • Show this post
    OneObuyan
    ... in order to have a more precise pit length before burning it on to the glass master. So actual physical changes to the Redbook CD.
    ...


    No not any change, it just means the process is more rigidly controlled 'allegedly'. All that can happen is if it works perfectly, a 'perfect' redbook CD glass master will be produced. Nothing 'outside' redbook standard is made.

    XRCD is marketing 'puff'.

  • OneObuyan edited over 8 years ago
    I am keeping my personal opinions and school dropout guess work engineering to myself, I suggest you all do the same. What you all believe to be or don't is not the subject here, and of no consequence to the debate, we are merely capturing and stating well known established and done with facts, nothing more.

    The reality is, At $40 a pop and Reel2Reel going for $300, they are best experienced with $30k+ systems, so quite down pls!

  • Show this post
    OneObuyan
    jansenENjanssenIf these are series, then why not Blu-spec CD, SHM-CD, etc? Same principle.

    AAD - Almost Analogue Digital


    AAD does not stand for Almost Analogue Digital. The SPARS codes stand for A=Analogue and D=Digital. And the 1st position is for recording, 2nd for mixing and 3rd for mastering. All CDs have a D as the last letter, LPs have an A (tho the code is not used for LPs). So:
    AAA = Analogue recording, mixing & mastering
    AAD = Analogue recording, analogue mixing, digital mastering
    ADD = Analogue recording, digital mixing, digital mastering
    DDD = All digital

  • Show this post
    marmilmjd66
    OneObuyanjansenENjanssenIf these are series, then why not Blu-spec CD, SHM-CD, etc? Same principle.

    AAD - Almost Analogue Digital

    AAD does not stand for Almost Analogue Digital. The SPARS codes stand for A=Analogue and D=Digital. And the 1st position is for recording, 2nd for mixing and 3rd for mastering. All CDs have a D as the last letter, LPs have an A (tho the code is not used for LPs). So:
    AAA = Analogue recording, mixing & mastering
    AAD = Analogue recording, analogue mixing, digital mastering
    ADD = Analogue recording, digital mixing, digital mastering
    DDD = All digital


    You are mistaking the SPARS (description) for the (Abbreviation).. It literally stands for "Almost Analogue Digital".
    Why and how is not the point, but thanks for sharing it anyway.
    For an example of an AAD record, see here: https://i.redditmedia.com/YUtCF4Zc2ehZpweq52uUMH1aehAOkHDflDYL_zV7O8A.jpg?w=1024&s=58d9b17fdf578ad87e845d26c9710f5a

  • Show this post
    OneObuyan

    OneObuyan
    marmilmjd66OneObuyanjansenENjanssenIf

    AAD - Almost Analogue Digital

    You are mistaking the SPARS (description) for the (Abbreviation).. It literally stands for "Almost Analogue Digital".
    Why and how is not the point, but thanks for sharing it anyway.
    For an example of an AAD record, see here: https://i.redditmedia.com/YUtCF4Zc2ehZpweq52uUMH1aehAOkHDflDYL_zV7O8A.jpg?w=1024&s=58d9b17fdf578ad87e845d26c9710f5a


    That's very interesting - I've never seen it before. Thanks!

  • sound_.mind edited over 8 years ago
    This isn't the place to debate the 'merits' of different technical enhancements..
    Rather than a series, I would also say Ultradisc UHR is a proprietary technical enhancement of an existing format.. and it should be added to the Free Text Field (FTF) of the Format section. It's an enhancement such as SHM (Super High Material) - i.e.. SHM-CD, Platinum SHM and SHM-SACD and they are placed in the FTF.
    Whereas SBM and Direct SBM are technical enhancements, I would say, HDCD is a format in that you require a dedicated player to realise the enhancement.

You must be logged in to post.