• pfue edited 11 days ago
    Hello, here we have the songwriter of The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face:
    - Chesley McCaull, credited on 2 releases
    - 569 releases

    If you listen the song of Chesley McCaull:
    - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7o2Acn0jGg4 ... I like this version
    - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oy-G-77q_aI ... and also this version ... my favourite

    ... it's the same written by Ewan MacColl:
    - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-GwaBX3aNg

    So I would like ask for use Chesley McCaull as an unusual name variation of Ewan MacColl. Thanks!

    Edit: Added [Resolved] into topic. Thank you

  • Show this post
    Not a merge but "wrong artist" I think; seems Roy MacCaull has somehow got attributed to these.

  • Show this post
    hetch197676
    Not a merge but "wrong artist" I think; seems Roy MacCaull has somehow got attributed to these.

    Thanks for research! We can also credit Ewan MacColl without ANV and place a note in release notes (RSG §1.7.2)

  • Show this post
    Hello Maherto, what's the best way in this constellation?

    - Chesley McCaull as a name variation (RSG §2.5.2)
    - Chesley McCaull in release notes (RSG §1.7.2)

    Since I can't detect an intention for this misspelling an alias isn't a option (RSG §2.1.7), I think.

  • pfue edited 12 days ago
    Yes, I edited the single version of The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face of The Chi-Lites and chose the ANV.

    Edit: Removed the Chesley McCaull name variation of Ewan MacColl. Thanks!

  • Show this post
    pfue
    Since I can't detect an intention for this misspelling an alias isn't a option (RSG §2.1.7), I think.


    I think we should use both linked as alias: too different names to be ANV, in my opinion.

  • Show this post
    Strange.
    There are three PANs in question:

    Chesley McCaull – 2 credits.

    To me it looks like these three PANs have been set up for two different artists:
    - Ewan MacColl, per the profile a british folk singer/songwriter, and
    - Chesley McCaull.

    Both profiles look to be well researched, including their named children (Kirsty, Hamish, Neill, Calum and Kitty as opposed to Sandra). Both profiles have images in which I'd say different people are shown, and regarding the clear differences in the first as well as the family name I therefore doubt that Chesley McCaull are the same artist and might be ANVed.

    If this is true, it can only lead to the conclusion that one of the two artists is using other people's songwriting skills.

  • Show this post
    Chesley McCaull: BMI says Ewan MacColl as songwriter for First Time Ever I Saw Your Face

  • Show this post
    Clothdrum
    Roy MacCaull and Chesley McCaull are the same artist and might be ANVed.

    I don't think so Roy MacCaull doesn't wrote The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face which is the only credit of Chesley McCaull.

  • Show this post
    pfue
    ClothdrumRoy MacCaull and Chesley McCaull are the same artist and might be ANVed.
    I don't think so Roy MacCaull doesn't wrote The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face which is the only credit of Chesley McCaull.

    Agree

  • Show this post
    Even the labels under which the artists released their work differ completely:

    Marathon (3) (all: Canadian).

    Regarding labels, there is no overlap between the artists.

  • Show this post
    pfue
    the only credit of Chesley McCaull.

    ... but printed on releases under his name, . image 2, so correctly credited.

  • Show this post
    Suggestion for the relevant entries concerning "First Time Ever I Saw Your Face" :
    Written By [Miscredited] - Chesley McCaull
    Written-By - Ewan MacColl
    Source: BMI

  • Show this post
    RSG §1.7.2

    If we agree that Ewan MacColl wrote this song and that Chesley Maccaull is another person, that applies.

    Is there any reason to think:
    1 Ewan MacColl did not write the song
    Or
    2 That Chesley MacCaull is anything other than an error?

    If there is no evidence for these, ANVs and aliases are not allowed. It should (not can) be corrected.

  • Show this post
    Clothdrum
    ... but printed on releases under his name, . image 1 and image 2, so correctly credited.

    ... correctly submitted! I think it's a case of hetch197676, and the question is:

    Is Chesley McCaull totally wrong or not totally and a name variation of Ewan MacColl? Or an alias, what's not by my liking.

  • Show this post
    F56
    Written By [Miscredited] - Chesley McCaull
    Written-By - Ewan MacColl

    +1 a good suggestion

  • Show this post
    hetch197676
    If there is no evidence for these, ANVs and aliases are not allowed. It should (not can) be corrected.

    +1 my ANV suggestion is not the best

  • Show this post
    can live with PAN or ANVs + notes, not alias

    ps. The Clams (2) - Close To You actually has "MacCaull"

  • Show this post
    hetch197676
    If we agree that Ewan MacColl wrote this song and that Chesley Maccaull is another person

    ... for the songwriting: most likely; regarding different artists: 100%.

    hetch197676
    RSG §1.7.2 [... ] applies.

    Again, agreed.

    F56
    Written By [Miscredited] - Chesley McCaull
    Written-By - Ewan MacColl
    pfue
    +1 a good suggestion

    ed.

  • Show this post
    F56
    Written By [Miscredited] - Chesley McCaull


    I don't see how RSG §1.7.2 s this.

    I know people just want to give the maximum information but the guidelines are there to give a consistent approach to issues. If the decision is made that it is credited to the wrong artist, the incorrect artist must go in the notes

  • Clothdrum edited 14 days ago
    hetch197676
    I don't see how RSG §1.7.2 s this.

    It's not RSG §1.7.2 alone, but a combination of §1.7.2 and §10.4.2 that applies here:

    RSG §10.4.2Written By (unlinked) – 2. In addition to the linked credit(s), in order to replicate the complete writer credit as it is formatted on the release.


    edited: 'Written By'

  • Show this post
    Clothdrum
    RSG §10.4.2 – Written By (unlinked) – 2. In addition to the linked credit(s)


    I agree that's a reasonable interpretation of the guideline although I'd always read it as being supplementary to the linked credit, not where it contradicts the linked credit.

    If that's how it goes, RSG §10.2.3 describes the use of square brackets. It doesn't seem to include the possibility of repeating the mandatory explanation by adding "[miscredited]"

  • el_duro edited 14 days ago
    Both should be used, the unlinked Written By role for the miscredited artist in addition to the linked Written-By [Uncredited] role for the actual writer and an explanation should be added to the notes:

    Written By - Chesley McCaull
    Written-By [Uncredited] - Ewan MacColl

    The songwriter of "The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face" is miscredited as Chesley McCaull on the artwork. The song was actually written by Ewan MacColl

  • Show this post
    el_duro
    Both should be used, the unlinked Written By role for the miscredited artist in addition to the linked Written-By [Uncredited] role for the actual writer and an explanation should be added to the notes:

    Written By - Chesley McCaull
    Written-By [Uncredited] - Ewan MacColl

    The songwriter of "The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face" is miscredited as Chesley McCaull on the artwork. The song was actually written by Ewan MacColl

    Better + 1, thx

  • Show this post
    el_duro
    Both should be used, the unlinked Written By role for the miscredited artist in addition to the linked Written-By [Uncredited] role for the actual writer and an explanation should be added to the notes:

    Written By - Chesley McCaull
    Written-By [Uncredited] - Ewan MacColl

    The songwriter of "The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face" is miscredited as Chesley McCaull on the artwork. The song was actually written by Ewan MacColl

    Sounds good to me, too.
    +1

  • Show this post
    Agree with the solution el_duro proposes. Assuming that there aren't two songs with the title "The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face," which seems unlikely to me, this is the best option for whoever didn't do their homework on the writing credits for this release.

  • Show this post
    el_duro
    Both should be used, the unlinked Written By role for the miscredited artist in addition to the linked Written-By [Uncredited] role for the actual writer and an explanation should be added to the notes:

    Written By - Chesley McCaull
    Written-By [Uncredited] - Ewan MacColl

    The songwriter of "The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face" is miscredited as Chesley McCaull on the artwork. The song was actually written by Ewan MacColl


    This.

  • Show this post
    el_duro
    Both should be used, the unlinked Written By role for the miscredited artist in addition to the linked Written-By [Uncredited] role for the actual writer and an explanation should be added to the notes:

    Written By - Chesley McCaull
    Written-By [Uncredited] - Ewan MacColl

    The songwriter of "The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face" is miscredited as Chesley McCaull on the artwork. The song was actually written by Ewan MacColl


    +1

  • Show this post
    el_duro
    Both should be used, the unlinked Written By role for the miscredited artist in addition to the linked Written-By [Uncredited] role for the actual writer and an explanation should be added to the notes:

    Written By - Chesley McCaull
    Written-By [Uncredited] - Ewan MacColl

    The songwriter of "The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face" is miscredited as Chesley McCaull on the artwork. The song was actually written by Ewan MacColl

    Agreed, this is how I always do it - +1

  • Chimiel edited 14 days ago
    pfue
    F56Written By [Miscredited] - Chesley McCaull
    Written-By - Ewan MacColl
    +1 a good suggestion


    If it is miscredited it goes to release notes.. is my thought..
    There a much more releases with wrong credits but they end up in notes instead of using the bracketed "Miscredited"

    We have to avoid that people on forum topic ask for a new credit role ..

  • theksmusik edited 14 days ago
    Actually it should be, based on how it was decided in this thread:

    Written By [Miscredited] – Chesley McCaull
    Written-By [Uncreditied] – Ewan MacColl

    With a succinct remark about the error in the Release Notes and the source of the correction (BMI) in the Submission Notes.

    [Edit: corrected link; Windows clipboard drives me crazy sometimes]

  • Show this post
    theksmusik
    Actually it should be, base on how it was decided in this thread:

    Wrong link?

    theksmusik
    Written By [Miscredited]

    It would make sense, but "[Miscredited]" is not a part of the RSG.

  • Show this post
    j_lit Corrected link above.

  • j_lit edited 14 days ago
    theksmusik
    j_lit Corrected link above.

    Thx!
    Comment still stands, despite the consensus there. Perhaps a welcome addition to the guidelines, but "[Miscredited]" is not a part of the RSG, let alone RSG §10.2.3.

    RSG §1.7.2. and RSG §10.4.2. tell us exactly how to handle this situation.

  • Show this post
    Thank you very much for the many comments and for refreshing my knowledge of the guidelines! So Chesley McCaull and Chesley MacCaull, thanks for the hint Ewan MacColl.

    el_duro
    Both should be used, the unlinked Written By role for the miscredited artist in addition to the linked Written-By [Uncredited] role for the actual writer and an explanation should be added to the notes: ....

    +1 excellent

  • el_duro edited 13 days ago
    edit
    nevermind

  • mr_mando edited 13 days ago
    theksmusik
    Written By [Miscredited] – Chesley McCaull
    Written-By [Uncreditied] – Ewan MacColl

    With a succinct remark about the error in the Release Notes and the source of the correction (BMI) in the Submission Notes.

    +1

  • Show this post
    el_duro
    to justify the entirely incorrect edit

    It's based on a majority vote and therfore completely acceptable.

  • Show this post
    el_duro
    review his comment

    I will, thanks for clarification so far.
    But I'm afraid I have a few more questions for my understanding:

    1) As you yourself and cheebacheebakid wrote in the other thread you linked to above,
    Written By [Miscredited] – Chesley McCaull
    Written-By [Uncreditied] – Ewan MacColl
    would be considered "completely incorrect" resp. "entirely incorrect".

    On the other hand, you proposed to use
    el_duro
    Written By - Chesley McCaull
    Written-By [Uncredited] - Ewan MacColl
    plus an appropriate Notes entry.

    So the difference that makes the Credits entry "entirely incorrect" is the explanatory addition [Miscredited] only. Right?

    2) cheebacheebakid as well as you (in the quote) refer to, doesn't mention to use the unlinked 'Written By' at all.
    Since it's "chrystal clear" how to use 1.7.2, should that unlinked credit be used here? Or wouldn't that be considered "entirely incorrect" as well, since the guideline only tells us to put this info into Notes, but not to use 'Written By' additionally?

    last chapter edited

  • Show this post
    Clothdrum
    So the difference that makes the Credits entry "entirely incorrect" is the explanatory addition [Miscredited] only. Right?


    Correct. The only exception for a "reasonable description of the instrument or credit role" in square brackets is "[Uncredited]", per current RSG.

    Clothdrum
    Since it's "chrystal clear" how to use 1.7.2, should that unlinked credit be used here?


    The unlinked role can be used per 10.4.2. (2), "to replicate the complete writer credit as it is formatted on the release". The credit on the release is given as Chesley McCaull and thus the miscredited role can be entered in order to make sure the data is as close as possible in relation to the physical release (1.1.2.). Notes should be used to explain the erroneous credit.

    https://www.discogs.sitioby.com/forum/thread/1034224?message_id=10643419#10643419

  • Show this post
    Ok, understood.
    So here, and I was wrong. My apologies, still learning...
    And thank you, el_duro!

  • Show this post
    theksmusik
    Actually it should be, based on how it was decided in this thread:

    Written By [Miscredited] – Chesley McCaull
    Written-By [Uncreditied] – Ewan MacColl

    With a succinct remark about the error in the Release Notes and the source of the correction (BMI) in the Submission Notes.

    [Edit: corrected link; Windows clipboard drives me crazy sometimes]


    Why is this miscredited so sudden allowed? It goes to the notes.
    If this is allowed for this particular release then ALL releases with miscrediting needs
    to be fixed. You cannot allow it for a handful and leave the rest.

  • Show this post
    j_lit
    Both should be used, the unlinked Written By role for the miscredited artist in addition to the linked Written-By [Uncredited] role for the actual writer and an explanation should be added to the notes:

    Written By - Chesley McCaull
    Written-By [Uncredited] - Ewan MacColl

    The songwriter of "The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face" is miscredited as Chesley McCaull on the artwork. The song was actually written by Ewan MacColl


    This is how it should be
    I do not agree that [Miscredited] should be used.

  • Show this post
    Thank you very much! So I will go the Written By, Written-By [Uncredited], Notes way ed by a good majority and the guidelines.

    Maybe Clothdrum will carry the message into the Tina Turner/Ben Tucker thread.

  • Show this post
    pfue
    Clothdrum will carry the message into the Tina Turner/Ben Tucker thread.

    Done. Please see https://www.discogs.sitioby.com/forum/thread/1117293?page=1&message_id=11654860#11654860

  • Show this post
    ...de nada.

  • Show this post
    pfue
    Thank you very much! So I will go the Written By, Written-By [Uncredited], Notes way ed by a good majority and the guidelines.

    Maybe theksmusik and Clothdrum will carry the message into the Tina Turner/Ben Tucker thread.


    Late to the party but +1 to this.

  • Show this post
    Thanks again, I've completed the edits

You must be logged in to post.